Process

Build the wiki. Encode the lens. Generate the kit. Let the system compound.

rVantage starts by mapping the organization's record at the artifact level, then applies governed lenses that convert context into auditable recommendations.

Operating model

The process in six steps

01

Ingest

Capture public, owned, and approved internal sources with provenance attached to every item.

02

Normalize

Extract metadata, entities, dates, claims, authors, topics, citations, and relationships.

03

Build

Create a tiered wiki: public surface, resources and assets, underlying evidence and research, operations and approval context.

04

Encode

Translate business priorities into a governed lens with criteria, weights, source rationale, confidence rules, and escalation thresholds.

05

Apply

Run lenses and agents across the wiki. Walk one hop or more through the citation and relationship graph when a signal fires.

06

Compound

Decisions, approvals, send-backs, changes, and new sources update the wiki and improve future scoring.

Artifact-level mapping

Scattered assets in. Decision-ready outputs out.

Every artifact — page, program, citation, policy, approval — becomes a node in the wiki. Lenses read across the whole graph.

rVantage WikiContext GraphWeb PagesProgramsToolsMeasuresResearchCitationsProductsPeopleCompetitorsPoliciesApprovalsSupport TicketsSales MaterialsAlignment ReviewLeadership ReviewCompetitive StrategyAEO/GEO RecommendationsRecords PackageToken OptimizationResearch EnhancementSCATTERED ASSETSLENS OUTPUTS
A single item's journey

How one artifact moves through

1

Description pass

The item is summarized and classified against the lens criteria.

2

Route

Confidence and risk determine where it goes next.

3

Deeper dig

If a signal fires, agents walk the citation graph for evidence.

4

Kit generated

A structured output kit is produced — not a chat reply.

5

Human review

A reviewer approves, revises, holds, or sends back.

6

Feedback

The decision updates weights, status, and downstream dependencies.

Green — aligned, ready to approveYellow — framing or evidence editsRed — hold and escalate
The output standard

The output is a kit, not a chat reply

Every lens output follows the same reusable schema — so reviewers always know where to look, and every recommendation carries its evidence with it.

  • Verdict and criteria check
  • Signal and interpretation
  • Evidence with source trail
  • Risk and recommended action
  • Confidence band
  • Reviewer action and history
Yellow
Leadership Review Lens
Artifact: Market Research Brief: Healthcare Access Tool
Signal
The proposed research brief aligns with current strategic priorities but lacks a deployment pathway and measurable owner.
Interpretation
The asset is directionally aligned, but it may stall in leadership review because it reads as descriptive rather than operational.
Evidence
Priority memo, product roadmap, prior approved release, program owner notes.
Risk
Medium — approval delay and inconsistent framing.
Action
Add implementation pathway, success metric, owner, and 150-word executive summary.
Confidence
84%
Source trail
wiki://northstar/market-research-brief-healthcare-a · 6 linked sources · full provenance
Reviewer
Compounding

The system gets sharper with every decision

Priorities evolve

The lens recompiles — no retraining, no rebuild.

New resources ship

The wiki grows and the graph re-links automatically.

Feedback arrives

Approvals and send-backs tighten the weighting.

Approval status changes

Downstream dependencies update across the graph.

r you taking advantage?

See the operating model on your own artifacts

Week one is a source inventory. Week three is your first lens outputs.

Request a PilotExplore the Personas